Augmenting brains
  Why Fleabyte?
  Fleabyte fundamentals
  Orality, Literacy, Computency
  Unfinished Revolution

From elsewhere

  Fleabyte fundamentals:
What you've got underneath may not take you to the top

  A Flea in the Bonnet

human brain and networking diagram

Fleabyte: Augmenting the human brain

A personal journey

Henry K van Eyken
Begun: August 10, 2018. Last edit: August 30, 2018  180810-0

Fleabyte has been my term for any pocket computer for at least three decades. My first acquantance with Fleabyte was the Radio Shack PC-4 (soon renamed to Tandy PC-4) with its 12-character LCD display. The programming language was a simple version of BASIC (All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code). Manufacture began in 1982, but I don't recall when I acquired it. Without any knowledge of the intracacies of computer science, it became immediately evident that this device and its further develoments ought become a way toward augmenting the human brain and, hence, become an asset to education and work; indeed for everyday life.  180810-1

As a chemistry teacher I immediately had a good use for it. I programmed it for checking sudents' laboratory reports. I would enter their experimentally obtained data to check their calculations, printed those out to obtain the -wide paper strips with the program's calculated data, and, instead of making handwritten corrections, pasted those strips in the margins of their lab reports so that students could see if and where calculating errors occur.  180810-3

Next I prepared offer a course about pocket computers for college teachers and prepared a text for it, The very first original Fleabyte course. The course included simple BASIC programming and for getting the feel of things about 75 demo programs, all taking up less than 1.5 kilobytes. But far more importantly, the cousrse's emphasis was on the pocket computer's potential as an intimate companion: people becoming beings of two minds: a neural mind augmented by a digital mind. Here is how I introduced the course (in 1988):  180816-1

Fleabyte is my term of endearment for the pocket computer or, for that matter, any programmable computer that can be carried on a person as comfortably as a watch or a ballpoint, a wallet or a pocket knife, a handkerchief or a pair of glasses. Like all these small and so useful articles, Fleabyte is there where you need it, when you need it. If any computer deserves to be called personal, the honor must be little Fleabyte's.  180816-2
It is quite wrong to view Fleabyte as a poor man's alternative to the desktop computer and just as wrong to mistake it for a handheld calculator. Even though all three have a common electronic ancestry and have many overlapping functions, they do differ in more than one way. One difference, the one I believe to be the most important, is still barely in the offing: it is that little computer's role as an electronic extension of the brain. Fleabyte, playing this role in continuous intimacy, will affect both what we learn and how we learn. If this seems a little farfetched to you, just contemplate some developments in the past.  180816-3
That miniature, the wristwatch, has revolutionized man's daily life more than the clock ever did and one would expect that that other miniature, the pocket computer, will do the same. It, too, is bound to evolve into a lifetime companion. Given that opportunity, it will increasingly take charge of many routine memory and thinking tasks and thereby free the neural brain for occupations of greater interest. We may all have a chip on the shoulder one day.  180816-4
Literacy has changed the consciousness of man, an occurrence that has been carefully investigated and documented.* The printing press has brought further such change. Computer literacy—computency—one ought to expect, will cause even more change in consciousness. My personal view is that computency is an extension of general literacy in the sense that now not only man, but also his machine can act on recorded thought. Computency may soon be at the very foundation of formal education, along with reading and writing.  180816-5/a>
In the meantime, however, while being fully cognisant of its potential, it is probably best to simply regard Fleabyte as a step toward feeling comfortable with computers. It may be had for little money and one can learn to use it with a modicum of effort. And as one learns, one is likely to be surprised by the amount of plain, old-fashioned utilitarian value Fleabyte has. How much of it, though, will depend on the person using it; on the things he does in, and with, life. It can make money matters tractable and perform other chores of an administrative nature. It can rank data, evaluate them, sort out things. It can take on computational tasks way beyond the ability of the handheld calculator. It can help think and remember. It can educate, it can entertain, it can amaze. And because Fleabyte is light and small and is powered by tiny batteries, it does all this just about anywhere you want it to, something which even the laptop computer cannot. Fleabyte, you will agree, commands a deep and abiding respect.  180816-6

The course was well received, but lasted for only two or three years because the kind of cheap programmable computers used—notably from Casio*—went off the market which was not sufficiently favorable. Pocket computers, as we knew them then, featured liquid-crystal displays (LCDS) capable of accomodating only one or two lines of text ranging from 12 to 24 or so characters. The programming language was usually BASIC. Computer literacy in those days was for all practical purposes synonymous with the ability to program in BASIC. But things began to change drastically around 1889.  180816-7

There is a chapter in my course text that looks to me still very much relevant today: Orality, Literacy, and Computency.  180816-8

I still had much, very much to learn (to the point of naivité, as I still do now), not only about hardware and programming languages, but also about highly capable people way ahead of me. Alan Kaye for example, who conceived the Dynabook, describing it in 1972 as "A personal computer for children of all ages." Not long thereafter, the Learning Research Groupo at Xerox Palo Alto set out to develop it, a "personal dynamic medium the size of a notebook, which could be owned by everyone and could have the power to handle vistually all of its owner's information related needs. It would respond to questions, it would have enough capacity to store anything the owner would like to remember, it would have high quality video and audio output, and it would have enough power to respond instantly." Kaye further worked out a concept for the programming language Smalltalk, specially designed for educational purposes.  180901-1
Fleabyte is not Dynabook. The tasks envisaged for Dynabook do not fit within the 1.5-K to 300-K range of those days' pocket computers.  180901-2

I found it hard to keep up with all the rapid developments going on while also being a full-time college teacher. Trying to promote pocket computers to be optimized for truly personal augmentation puts me in a highly sophisticated world of professionals and specialized organizations such as Xerox, Microsoft, Apple, etc, etc.. For that reason I applied for a grant to allow me a year full-time to try to follow through with my notion of on-the-person computing or personal augmentation. It was rejected. Maybe that in the opinion of the grants committee I was overly audacious, overreaching myself. Looking back, probably likely so. But it was the way I was heard to explain my case that upset me. More on that in two of my Letters to my Dawson Colleages: here and in the next letter.  180816-9

Now, three decades later, the name Fleabyte includes Apple's iPod (which is no longer manufactured), the ubiquitus iPhone and competing devices that have taken the market by storm. Mine is the 16GB version of an iPod and there are apps that let one make programs in Python. Like BASIC, Python is available in an interpreted version. I haven't made programs in donkey's ages, but maybe I can still, at my age, revive some simple programming skills. We shall see, what we shall see.  180816-11

* * *

With programmable pocket computers off the market, I turned to an Atari ST and got familiar with a superior kind of BASIC, GFA BASIC. I used it for making some rudimentary on-screen scientific calculators with built-in physical constants and atomic weights and adaptations for doing some simple chemical calculations as found in a college general chemistry course. This made me wonder about what we really should be teaching in such a course.  180829-1

And another thing. I could transfer an entire equation or just the answer to an editor by a simple click. In other words, I joined two apps, but actually without understanding just what in the Atari's operating system (TOS) made this possible. Reminiscent of a term in quantum physics, I named it a wormhole But, more importantly, if one can make two apps intimately working together, well, why not three or more? I still had a lot to learn, still do!  180829-2

The screens of the Atari monitors were quite small, but it soon became possible to build computers from components and thereby getting away from proprietary machines and operating systems along with the ability to have larger display areas to work with. What then botered me were the long lines of black text and their harsh contrast with backlit white backgrounds. Those needed to be softened which led me to shorten those long lines of text, to give them a dark brown color on a parchment background—as we have here. Margins became available for things like a display of a document's content or some comment. Those secondary texts were put in smaller print as were some comments in the main text. Character size and a slightly brighter brown serve as something akin to intonation in speech.  180829-3

Many people prefer to read from paper than from screens. This led me to wonder about language as printed, language with an extensive use of synonyms with many syllables. Shouldn't we, for the screen at least, try to use a simpkler way of expressing ourselves? I have looked at old English, at Latin, even at proto-Indo-European, and all I can say is that it's a complicated subject. But still ....  180829-4

Things simply became overwhelming for a person just trying to think things through by himself in a world from many sides is screaming for attention. Among them unpleasant experiences at my place of work, Dawson College. More about that in Letters to my Dawson colleagues written in 1990.  180829-5

* * *

Twenty years had gone by when I learned about a symposium named The Unfinished Revolution held in the winter of 2000. What made me join it as an on-line participant, I just don't remember, but it turned out to be, what do I say, quite an experience, in the course of which I was asked to serve as volunteer webmaster for an organization led by computer pioneer Douglas Engelbart. From retirement life far from the madden crowd, it brought me in touch with intellectuals and experts and going-ons in Silican Valley, plus the good fortune of being invited to come over as a guest of Doug himself a number of times. There I met inventors like Ted Nelson, professors at Stanford University, and somewhat lesser lights, but still, whose intellectual stations were way above mine.  180829-6

On my first visit, I was asked to make a brief presentation for a dozen or so people from Doug's circle. I projected a brief text loaded with musical terms most people are not familiar with, but I had copied from a booklet enclosed with recordings of the violinist Accardo playing Paganini. I asked my audience to silently read it and then suggested that their own general audiences would have similar difficulties understanding them.  180829-7

And not only that, keeping things simple goes a longer way for it permits people to get a grasp of many more things that affect human society— to become "all-terrain vehicles" as I had pointed out in my twelfth letter to my Dawson colleagues, here.  180829-8

As for my stint as Doug's webmaster, some people felt they could improve on my work by using more of the tricks html has on offer, but I didn't go for that. There is more to making and maintaining a website that knowing how to exploit html, some of which I mentioned above.  180829-9

Doug's thinking was often hard to follow, but at age 75 he had learned to live with it—without ever giving up on trying to promote his vision of how the advent of the computer is an opportunity to augment the human intellect and thereby serve his stated lifetime goal: "As much as possible, to boost mankind's collective capability for coping with complex, urgent problems." It was in the pursuit of this goal that his research efforts let to to such now ordinary things as the computer mouse, the computer's graphical user interface, hyperlinking, email, and some other contributions. More about this in my brief overview Unfinished Revolution. But something needs emphasis right here.  180829-9

All his highly sophisticated thinking and work notwithstanding, Doug's primary concern was humanitarian, not technical. As such he became strongly opposed to soulless artificial intelligence for entirely replacing the human brain. He perceived computers as a device to help—augment—the human brain. Big difference.  180829-10

Ideas and ideals have changed much during recorded history and with them the educational objectives we set for our young. I don't recall my source, but here is how somebody lined up the sort of contributions some thinkers made to society, to which I added an option:  180829-11

The Guardian – Plato 
The Orator – Isocrates 
The Stoic – Zeno 
The Christian – Augustine  
The Scholastic – Acquinas 
The Humanist – Erasmus 
The Pansophist – Comenius 
The Gentleman – Locke 
The Natural Man – Rousseau 
The Scientific Humanist – Huxley 
The Communal Man – Marx 
The Reflective Man – Dewey
The Lettered Man – Eliot
The Existential Man – Buber 
The Planned Man – Skinner 
Either The Obsolete Man – A.I. 
or The Augmented Man – Engelbart180829-12

Engelbart's site (that of his Bootstrap Institute) was eventually replaced by that of The Engelbart Institute run by his daughter Christina.  180829-13* * *

My website has for the last dozen of years or so been devoted to the history of my wife's patrilinear ancestry. Part of it, named My 2 cents, was intentionally left blank until I might have something of value to contribute on-line. That came about in 2014 when I began an "on-going" essay about the Canadian Senate which, I think, ought to be made of much greater value to Canadians in these times of ever accellerating global change and worldwide calamities. And with that, I'll point to the menu bars at the top of this page.  180829-11


Walter J. Ong, Orality and Literacy, Methuen, 1982.  *   fn1

Casio, for some time much engaged in designing and manufacturing pocket computers, came up with many models as shown here.  *   fn1

The space below serves to put any hyperlinked targets at the top of the window

Valid XHTML 1.0!     tux     mveMVE


Above space serves to put hyperlinked targets at the top of the window